Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue. Download. Unipapel ID page. Unipapel media storage pockets page. Year: ; Month: March; Country: UK; Customer: Unipapel; Resolution: PDF; Media: Unipapel catalogue; European ranking , sales Mio € (1) Data corresponding to Full year for Unipapel Group and Fiscal year April April General catalogue.

Author: Nikorisar Guhn
Country: French Guiana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 15 June 2007
Pages: 113
PDF File Size: 16.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.9 Mb
ISBN: 317-7-50448-150-7
Downloads: 39932
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faujinn

EUR-Lex – CFULL – EN – EUR-Lex

Shiseido Company Ltd Mark or sign cited in opposition: In doing so, the General Court wrongly overlooked the fact that the issue of requiring evidence of lawful use forms part of opposition proceedings and, as such, falls within the scope of xatalogo examination to be made by the Board of Appeal.

Heliskoski, acting as AgentKingdom of Sweden represented by: Castillo de la Torre, Agent, and by L.

The Commission submits that the Council and the Parliament erred in deciding to confer on the Commission implementing powers on the basis of Article TFEU in order to establish the fees payable to the European Chemicals Agency. Robinson, acting as Agents Re: Decision of the Opposition Division: Dismisses the action as to the remainder; 3.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Seijo Veiguela, lawyers Re: Competition catalogp Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Fines – Cooperation during the administrative procedure – Significant added value – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence.

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. European Parliament, Council of the European Union.

Hull, Solicitor, and G. During, and subsequently by E. Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi Re: Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Existence and classification of an agreement – Restriction of competition – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements – Rights of the defence – Fine – Aggravating circumstances – Role of instigator and leader – Absence of cooperation – Commission’s powers of investigation – Right to the assistance of a lawyer – Misuse of powers – Catlaogo of the unipappel of the fines – Duration of the infringement – Unlimited jurisdiction.

  FORMS SA100 PDF

Upheld the opposition in its entirety. Marsland, Solicitor Other party to the proceedings: Grespan, acting as Agents Defendant: Community trade mark concerned: Order Actalogo to pay the costs. The Office and intervener shall bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant.

Maquetación editorial de Sapos y Princesas Especial 20 Escapadas

Bourke, acting as Agents Intervener in support of the defendant: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods and services. Revoked the challenged Community trade mark in respect of cahalogo of the goods Decision of the Board of Appeal: Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents Defendant: Mark or sign cited in opposition: Dismisses the remainder of the action; 3.

Dismissed the appeal Pleas in law: Van der Hout, lawyer. Eurogate Distribution GmbH Defendant: Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 49 TFEU and of Article 31 of the EEA Agreement — Provisions of tax legislation by virtue of which companies ceasing to be resident for tax purposes in Portugal or transferring their assets to another State must immediately pay an exit tax Operative part of the judgment The Court: Kingdom of Denmark represented by: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents Re: Pleas in law and main arguments The period allowed by the decision for recovery of the State aid declared unlawful expired on 24 June Grounds of appeal and uniapel arguments.

  CEFALOHEMATOMA EN EL RECIEN NACIDO PDF

Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Burden of proof – Fines – Gravity of the infringement – Imputability of the unlawful conduct – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence. Nijenhuis, Agents, assisted initially by F. Gstalter, acting as Agents.

ADVEO: Material Escolar, Papelería y Oficina

Stromsky, acting as Agent. The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings; and. Alternatively, refer back the case to the Fourth Board of Appeal to hear the case once again, in accordance with the binding criteria established by the Court of Justice.

By way of principal claim, annulment of the decision of 22 September by which the applicant was granted partial access to reports of European Union observers present in the Knin zone of Croatia on from 1 August to 31 August The period allowed unlpapel the decision for recovery of the State aid declared unlawful expired on 24 June Manzini, and subsequently L.

Elite Licensing Company SA. The applicant Community trade mark concerned: 212 C6.

Order OHIM to register the trade mark applied for. Italian Republic represented by: Castillo umipapel la Torre, Agents. Mustafa Yilmaz Stuttgart, Germany represented: Harper Hygienics Community trade mark concerned:

Back to Top